Kyoka Okamura vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 09:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Okamura vs C. Meligeni Alves

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Okamura 1 - 0 Alves
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kyoka Okamura winning 2 and Carolina Meligeni Alves winning 1. The last match between Kyoka Okamura and Carolina Meligeni Alves was at the W75 Brescia, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Kyoka Okamura getting the victory 7-5 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Okamura | 1 |
| Alves | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Brescia(05-28-25)
K. Okamura vs C. M. Alves H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $84,931 | Career Prize Money | $130,308 |
| 53.52% (373-324) | Career Total W/L | 57.72% (441-323) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
K. Okamura vs C. M. Alves Match Preview:
- Alves has been more successful on their second serve in recent months, with a 40.27% win rate compared to Okamura's 38.32%. How significant is this margin? It suggests a slight edge for Alves.
- Looking at return games, Alves also leads by winning 54.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Okamura is at 51.09%.
- When returning first serves, Alves secures 36.21% of points, surpassing Okamura's 34.28%.
- Although Okamura has saved breakpoints more frequently at 46.84%, Alves is close with a 45.71% save rate.
- Over the past year, Alves boasts a higher match win percentage of 60.53%, whereas Okamura holds a 55.13% win rate.
- On clay, Alves performs significantly better with a 60% win rate, while Okamura struggles on this surface, winning only 43%.
- Conversely, Okamura excels on grass with a 64% win rate, whereas Alves has not won any matches on this surface.
- Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF events, with Alves winning 62.32% of these matches and Okamura winning 57.81%.
- Alves has faced lower-ranked opponents on average (418.37) compared to Okamura's 354.54.
- In deciding sets, Alves shows resilience, winning 62% of the time, slightly better than Okamura's 56%.
- While Alves converts 40.31% of breakpoint opportunities, Okamura narrowly leads with a 40.46% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
Alves demonstrates a marginal advantage in second serve efficiency and return game performance, crucial aspects in tightly contested matches. This hints at a potential edge in service games and break opportunities.
Mechanically, their matchup tendencies suggest Alves might dominate on clay, provided the match occurs on this surface, whereas Okamura could have masked strengths on grass, where they've historically excelled.
Alves's higher match win rate and proficiency in deciding sets might also be decisive, reflecting greater overall momentum and mental toughness.
Overall, considering these performance trends and stats, Alves is slightly more likely to secure victory in the upcoming encounter.
Kyoka Okamura vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Okamura vs C. M. Alves H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:45:32 | Average Match Time | 2:45:32 |
| 66% (73/110) | 1st Serve % | 76% (79/104) |
| 67% (49/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (49/79) |
| 46% (17/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 43% (45/104) | Return Points Win % | 40% (44/110) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Okamura Recent Matches Played
C. M. Alves Recent Matches Played

K. Okamura vs C. M. Alves Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.52% (373/324) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.72% (441/323) |
| 52.84% (856/764) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.49% (979/754) |
| 51.02% (7561/7260) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (8300/7350) |
| 53.56% (278/241) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.09% (41/52) |
| 45.76% (27/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.85% (398/267) |
| 56.18% (50/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 728 | Aces Total | 515 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1686 | Total Double Faults | 1431 |
| 1:20:48 | Average Match Time | 1:24:57 |
| 547.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.69 |
| 63% (21836/34754) | 1st Serve % | 69% (28290/41027) |
| 61% (13258/21836) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (16519/28290) |
| 45% (5858/12916) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5846/12737) |
| 47% (2005/4251) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2841/5652) |
| 45% (15763/35197) | Return Points Win % | 48% (20012/41625) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Slam W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 70.00% (7/3) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Main Tour W/L | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 53.65% (301/260) | Challenger W/L | 55.07% (266/217) |
| 61.70% (58/36) | Futures W/L | 66.52% (155/78) |
| 53% (368/691) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (432/753) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (60/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (74/142) |
| 50% (114/226) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/206) |
| 84% (374/314) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (433/381) |
| 16% (374/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (433/52) |
| 18% (323/58) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (331/58) |